| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1436172445-6979-1-git-send-email-avagin@openvz.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 11:47:01 +0300
From: Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Roger Luethi <rl@...lgate.ch>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/24] kernel: add a netlink interface to get information about processes (v2)
Currently we use the proc file system, where all information are
presented in text files, what is convenient for humans. But if we need
to get information about processes from code (e.g. in C), the procfs
doesn't look so cool.
>From code we would prefer to get information in binary format and to be
able to specify which information and for which tasks are required. Here
is a new interface with all these features, which is called task_diag.
In addition it's much faster than procfs.
task_diag is based on netlink sockets and looks like socket-diag, which
is used to get information about sockets.
A request is described by the task_diag_pid structure:
struct task_diag_pid {
__u64 show_flags; /* specify which information are required */
__u64 dump_stratagy; /* specify a group of processes */
__u32 pid;
};
dump_stratagy specifies a group of processes:
/* per-process strategies */
TASK_DIAG_DUMP_CHILDREN - all children
TASK_DIAG_DUMP_THREAD - all threads
TASK_DIAG_DUMP_ONE - one process
/* system wide strategies (the pid fiel is ignored) */
TASK_DIAG_DUMP_ALL - all processes
TASK_DIAG_DUMP_ALL_THREAD - all threads
show_flags specifies which information are required.
If we set the TASK_DIAG_SHOW_BASE flag, the response message will
contain the TASK_DIAG_BASE attribute which is described by the
task_diag_base structure.
struct task_diag_base {
__u32 tgid;
__u32 pid;
__u32 ppid;
__u32 tpid;
__u32 sid;
__u32 pgid;
__u8 state;
char comm[TASK_DIAG_COMM_LEN];
};
In future, it can be extended by optional attributes. The request
describes which task properties are required and for which processes
they are required for.
A response can be divided into a few netlink packets if the NETLINK_DUMP
has been set in a request. Each task is described by a message. Each
message contains the TASK_DIAG_PID attribute and optional attributes
which have been requested (show_flags). A message can be divided into a
few parts if it doesn’t fit into a current netlink packet. In this case,
the first message in the next packet contains the same PID and
attributes which doesn’t fit into the previous message.
The task diag is much faster than the proc file system. We don't need to
create a new file descriptor for each task. We need to send a request
and get a response. It allows to get information for a few tasks in one
request-response iteration.
As for security, task_diag always works as procfs with hidepid = 2 (highest
level of security).
I have compared performance of procfs and task-diag for the
"ps ax -o pid,ppid" command.
A test stand contains 30108 processes.
$ ps ax -o pid,ppid | wc -l
30108
$ time ps ax -o pid,ppid > /dev/null
real 0m0.836s
user 0m0.238s
sys 0m0.583s
Read /proc/PID/stat for each task
$ time ./task_proc_all > /dev/null
real 0m0.258s
user 0m0.019s
sys 0m0.232s
$ time ./task_diag_all > /dev/null
real 0m0.052s
user 0m0.013s
sys 0m0.036s
And here are statistics on syscalls which were called by each
command.
$ perf trace -s -o log -- ./task_proc_all > /dev/null
Summary of events:
task_proc_all (30781), 180785 events, 100.0%, 0.000 msec
syscall calls min avg max stddev
(msec) (msec) (msec) (%)
--------------- -------- --------- --------- --------- ------
read 30111 0.000 0.013 0.107 0.21%
write 1 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.00%
open 30111 0.007 0.012 0.145 0.24%
close 30112 0.004 0.011 0.110 0.20%
fstat 3 0.009 0.013 0.016 16.15%
mmap 8 0.011 0.020 0.027 11.24%
mprotect 4 0.019 0.023 0.028 8.33%
munmap 1 0.026 0.026 0.026 0.00%
brk 8 0.007 0.015 0.024 11.94%
ioctl 1 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.00%
access 1 0.019 0.019 0.019 0.00%
execve 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00%
getdents 29 0.008 1.010 2.215 8.88%
arch_prctl 1 0.016 0.016 0.016 0.00%
openat 1 0.021 0.021 0.021 0.00%
$ perf trace -s -o log -- ./task_diag_all > /dev/null
Summary of events:
task_diag_all (30762), 717 events, 98.9%, 0.000 msec
syscall calls min avg max stddev
(msec) (msec) (msec) (%)
--------------- -------- --------- --------- --------- ------
read 2 0.000 0.008 0.016 100.00%
write 197 0.008 0.019 0.041 3.00%
open 2 0.023 0.029 0.036 22.45%
close 3 0.010 0.012 0.014 11.34%
fstat 3 0.012 0.044 0.106 70.52%
mmap 8 0.014 0.031 0.054 18.88%
mprotect 4 0.016 0.023 0.027 10.93%
munmap 1 0.022 0.022 0.022 0.00%
brk 1 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.00%
ioctl 1 0.011 0.011 0.011 0.00%
access 1 0.032 0.032 0.032 0.00%
getpid 1 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.00%
socket 1 0.032 0.032 0.032 0.00%
sendto 2 0.032 0.095 0.157 65.77%
recvfrom 129 0.009 0.235 0.418 2.45%
bind 1 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.00%
execve 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00%
arch_prctl 1 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.00%
You can find the test program from this experiment in tools/test/selftest/taskdiag.
The idea of this functionality was suggested by Pavel Emelyanov
(xemul@), when he found that operations with /proc forms a significant
part of a checkpointing time.
Ten years ago there was attempt to add a netlink interface to access to /proc
information:
http://lwn.net/Articles/99600/
git repo: https://github.com/avagin/linux-task-diag
Changes from the first version:
David Ahern implemented all required functionality to use task_diag in
perf.
Bellow you can find his results how it affects performance.
> Using the fork test command:
> 10,000 processes; 10k proc with 5 threads = 50,000 tasks
> reading /proc: 11.3 sec
> task_diag: 2.2 sec
>
> @7,440 tasks, reading /proc is at 0.77 sec and task_diag at 0.096
>
> 128 instances of sepcjbb, 80,000+ tasks:
> reading /proc: 32.1 sec
> task_diag: 3.9 sec
>
> So overall much snappier startup times.
Many thanks to David Ahern for the help with improving task_diag.
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
Cc: Roger Luethi <rl@...lgate.ch>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists