linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1436173803.8279.1.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 06 Jul 2015 12:10:03 +0300
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in
 reverse order

On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 12:31 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> > The newly introduced device_for_each_child_reverse() would be used 
> > when MFD
> > core removes the device.
> > 
> > After this patch applied the devices will be removed in a reversed 
> > order. This
> > behaviour is useful when devices have implicit dependency on order, 
> > i.e.
> > consider MFD device with serial bus controller, such as SPI, and 
> > DMA IP that is
> > attached to serial bus controller: before remove the DMA driver we 
> > have to be
> > ensured that no DMA transfers is ongoing and the requested channel 
> > are unused.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Applied, thanks.

Hmm… Seems kinda mistake. I can't see this applied (and required
previous patches 4 and 5) to any of your branch neither in (today's)
linux-next.

> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> > index 1aed3b7..79eeaa5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
> > @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ void mfd_remove_devices(struct device *parent)
> >  {
> >  	atomic_t *cnts = NULL;
> >  
> > -	device_for_each_child(parent, &cnts, 
> > mfd_remove_devices_fn);
> > +	device_for_each_child_reverse(parent, &cnts, 
> > mfd_remove_devices_fn);
> >  	kfree(cnts);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(mfd_remove_devices);
> 

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/