[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1436189083-32527-8-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 15:24:41 +0200
From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>
To: eric.auger@...com, eric.auger@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, christoffer.dall@...aro.org,
marc.zyngier@....com, avi.kivity@...il.com, mtosatti@...hat.com,
feng.wu@...el.com, joro@...tes.org, b.reynal@...tualopensystems.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...aro.org,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: [RFC v2 7/9] VFIO: platform: add irq bypass producer management
This patch populates the IRQ bypass callacks:
- stop/resume producer simply consist in disabling/enabling the host irq
- add/del consumer: basically set the automasked flag to false/true
- update remains void
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>
---
v1 -> v2:
- device handle caching in vfio_platform_device is introduced in a
separate patch
- use container_of
---
drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
index d00ed24..7dc17a6 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
@@ -222,22 +222,49 @@ static int vfio_platform_is_active(struct vfio_platform_irq *irq)
static void vfio_platform_irq_bypass_stop(struct irq_bypass_producer *prod)
{
+ disable_irq(prod->irq);
}
static void vfio_platform_irq_bypass_resume(struct irq_bypass_producer *prod)
{
+ enable_irq(prod->irq);
}
static void vfio_platform_irq_bypass_add_consumer(
struct irq_bypass_producer *prod,
struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons)
{
+ int ret;
+ struct vfio_platform_irq *irq =
+ container_of(prod, struct vfio_platform_irq, producer);
+
+ //TODO
+ /*
+ * if the IRQ is active at irqchip level or VFIO (auto)masked
+ * this means the host IRQ is already under injection in the
+ * guest and this not safe to change the forwarding state at
+ * that stage.
+ * It is not possible to differentiate user-space masking
+ * from auto-masking, leading to possible false detection of
+ * active state.
+ */
+ prod->active = vfio_platform_is_active(irq);
+
+ ret = vfio_platform_set_automasked(irq, false);
+ WARN_ON(ret);
}
static void vfio_platform_irq_bypass_del_consumer(
struct irq_bypass_producer *prod,
struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons)
{
+ struct vfio_platform_irq *irq =
+ container_of(prod, struct vfio_platform_irq, producer);
+
+ if (prod->active)
+ vfio_platform_mask(irq);
+
+ vfio_platform_set_automasked(irq, true);
}
static int vfio_set_trigger(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev, int index,
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists