[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34054.1436189331@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 09:28:51 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Ravi Teja Darbha <ravi2j@...il.com>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Arjun Krishna Babu <arjunkrishnababu96@...il.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, lidza.louina@...il.com,
driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: dgnc: Replace macro with flow control statement by a function
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 18:50:12 +0530, Ravi Teja Darbha said:
> Why would you use a macro to avoid code duplication?
The macro does end up putting code in each place it's used.
However, the actual code is in one place rather than open-coded
in multiple places that can diverge over time (somebody patching 2 of
3 instances, and missing 1, for example).
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists