[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150706153221.GA588@gospo.home.greyhouse.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 11:32:21 -0400
From: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: GMAIL <ranamazharp@...il.com>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
vfalico@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, sanket.shah@...eroam.com,
mazhar.rana@...eroam.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bonding: "primary_reselect" with "failure" is not
working properly
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 05:34:01PM +0530, GMAIL wrote:
> On Friday 03 July 2015 11:46 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> >GMAIL <ranamazharp@...il.com> wrote:
[...]
>
> Looks good, added cosmetic changes for more readability,
> it might save some instructions :)
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 19eb990..317a494 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -689,40 +689,57 @@ out:
> }
> -static bool bond_should_change_active(struct bonding *bond)
> +static struct slave *bond_choose_primary_or_current(struct bonding *bond)
> {
> struct slave *prim = rtnl_dereference(bond->primary_slave);
> struct slave *curr = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
Probably a good idea to add back a blank line here.
Otherwise this logic appears to be proper to resolve your issue and
Jay's additions appear to handle the case where primary_slave is NULL.
> - if (!prim || !curr || curr->link != BOND_LINK_UP)
> - return true;
> + if (!prim || prim->link != BOND_LINK_UP) {
> + if (!curr || curr->link != BOND_LINK_UP)
> + return NULL;
> + return curr;
> + }
> +
> if (bond->force_primary) {
> bond->force_primary = false;
> - return true;
> + return prim;
> + }
> +
> + if (!curr || curr->link != BOND_LINK_UP)
> + return prim;
> +
> + /* At this point, prim and curr are both up */
> + switch (bond->params.primary_reselect) {
> + case BOND_PRI_RESELECT_ALWAYS:
> + return prim;
> + case BOND_PRI_RESELECT_BETTER:
> + if (prim->speed < curr->speed)
> + return curr;
> + if (prim->speed == curr->speed && prim->duplex <= curr->duplex)
> + return curr;
> + return prim;
> + case BOND_PRI_RESELECT_FAILURE:
> + return curr;
> + default:
> + netdev_err(bond->dev, "impossible primary_reselect %d\n",
> + bond->params.primary_reselect);
> + return curr;
> }
> - if (bond->params.primary_reselect == BOND_PRI_RESELECT_BETTER &&
> - (prim->speed < curr->speed ||
> - (prim->speed == curr->speed && prim->duplex <= curr->duplex)))
> - return false;
> - if (bond->params.primary_reselect == BOND_PRI_RESELECT_FAILURE)
> - return false;
> - return true;
> }
>
> /**
> - * find_best_interface - select the best available slave to be the active one
> + * bond_find_best_slave - select the best available slave to be the active one
> * @bond: our bonding struct
> */
> static struct slave *bond_find_best_slave(struct bonding *bond)
> {
> - struct slave *slave, *bestslave = NULL, *primary;
> + struct slave *slave, *bestslave = NULL;
> struct list_head *iter;
> int mintime = bond->params.updelay;
>
> - primary = rtnl_dereference(bond->primary_slave);
> - if (primary && primary->link == BOND_LINK_UP &&
> - bond_should_change_active(bond))
> - return primary;
> + slave = bond_choose_primary_or_current(bond);
> + if (slave)
> + return slave;
>
> bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
> if (slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP)
> ---
>
> Regards,
> Mazhar Rana
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists