linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150706160529.GC3182@x1>
Date:	Mon, 6 Jul 2015 17:05:29 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	dmaengine <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse
 order

On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 11:24 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> >> > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> > > On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 12:31 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> > > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> []
> 
> >> > > > Applied, thanks.
> >> > >
> >> > > Hmm… Seems kinda mistake. I can't see this applied (and required
> >> > > previous patches 4 and 5) to any of your branch neither in
> >> > > (today's)
> >> > > linux-next.
> >> >
> >> > New stuff applied after v4.1 couldn't show up in -next before v4.2
> >> > -rc1 was
> >> > released (which just happened last night)?
> >>
> >> Might be, I would like to resend new version of my series and that's
> >> why I would like to have a branch to check what is already applied. So,
> >> if I can't see it does it mean it is brewed in the private repository?
> >
> > If you have patches that depend on this, they either need to come
> > through my tree, or you have to wait until the next kernel version
> > (which you probably don't want, right?).
> >
> > The alternative is that I unapply this patch and the whole lot can be
> > sucked up by the most appropriate subsystem.
> 
> I resent a new version for other comments(still with all patches
> included). Meanwhile the patches 4-6 (from v4 or v5, where they are
> the same) could be applied in the first place. Can you clarify what
> exactly you have applied? The idea is to put the rest via your
> subsystem since it's most appropriate for this series.

Easiest thing for me to do is unapply.

We can take the whole series when all the Acks have been accrued.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/