linux-kernel - Re: perf: fuzzer, lots of warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:36:38 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...il.com>
Subject: Re: perf: fuzzer, lots of warnings

On Fri, 3 Jul 2015, Vince Weaver wrote:

> On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > 
> > * Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu> wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm also still getting a lot of 
> > > 	perfevents: irq loop stuck!
> > > messages, I thought the workaround for that had gone in for 4.2 but I 
> > > guess not.
> > 
> > Hm, so I was waiting for your feedback regarding the precise period cutoff to use, 
> > and I guess that's where the patch got lost.
> > 
> > Does the value of 2 below work for you?
> 
> I still get the messages when using 2.  I'll see if I can narrow down the 
> cutoff.  I know the messages definitely go away when using 128.

>From what I can tell, a value of 2 will still generate "irq loop stuck", 
but 3 appears to be safe, but I'm still fuzzing to be sure.  Previously I 
ran a kernel with 5 for a while and that also did not generate any 
messages.

Vince


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/