[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1507061234390.19467@vincent-weaver-1.umelst.maine.edu>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:36:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...il.com>
Subject: Re: perf: fuzzer, lots of warnings
On Fri, 3 Jul 2015, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >
> > * Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm also still getting a lot of
> > > perfevents: irq loop stuck!
> > > messages, I thought the workaround for that had gone in for 4.2 but I
> > > guess not.
> >
> > Hm, so I was waiting for your feedback regarding the precise period cutoff to use,
> > and I guess that's where the patch got lost.
> >
> > Does the value of 2 below work for you?
>
> I still get the messages when using 2. I'll see if I can narrow down the
> cutoff. I know the messages definitely go away when using 128.
>From what I can tell, a value of 2 will still generate "irq loop stuck",
but 3 appears to be safe, but I'm still fuzzing to be sure. Previously I
ran a kernel with 5 for a while and that also did not generate any
messages.
Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists