linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 5/5] selftests: vm: Add tests for lock on fault

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150707145142.ccc0b63eb48a5e5dd307accf@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 7 Jul 2015 14:51:42 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Eric B Munson <emunson@...mai.com>
Cc:	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 5/5] selftests: vm: Add tests for lock on fault

On Tue,  7 Jul 2015 13:03:43 -0400 Eric B Munson <emunson@...mai.com> wrote:

> Test the mmap() flag, and the mlockall() flag.  These tests ensure that
> pages are not faulted in until they are accessed, that the pages are
> unevictable once faulted in, and that VMA splitting and merging works
> with the new VM flag.  The second test ensures that mlock limits are
> respected.  Note that the limit test needs to be run a normal user.

So we don't have tests for the new syscalls?

I have renumbered those syscalls (added 1) because of sys_userfaultfd.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/