[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 09:54:53 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Chris Park <chris.park@...el.com>,
Dean Lee <dean.lee@...el.com>,
Johnny Kim <johnny.kim@...el.com>,
Rachel Kim <rachel.kim@...el.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Clarification for the use of additional fields in the message
body
> The date, as far as I know, is ignored. It is the commit date,
> not the authoring date, and once your patch is applied by a maintainer
> (i.e. committed), the date gets reset anyway.
Thanks for your feedback.
> No need to try and preserve it.
I find that it might occasionally help to share and keep the record
on timestamps about the evolution for an original update suggestion.
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists