linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] create SMAF module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 07 Jul 2015 09:59:23 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>
Cc:	tom.gall@...aro.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, hverkuil@...all.nl,
	laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch,
	robdclark@...il.com, treding@...dia.com, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
	tom.cooksey@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] create SMAF module

A nit only, I'm afraid: a license mismatch.

On ma, 2015-07-06 at 13:40 +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/smaf/smaf-core.c

> + * License terms:  GNU General Public License (GPL), version 2

> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

The comment at the top of this file states, succinctly, that the license
is GPL v2. And, according to include/linux/module.h, the
MODULE_LICENSE() macro here states that the license is GPL v2 or later.
So I think that either that comment or the ident used in that macro
needs to change.

Ditto for 2/2.

Thanks,


Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/