lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 7 Jul 2015 02:58:14 -0700
From:	tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	bp@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	mingo@...nel.org, jroedel@...e.de, jin.xiao@...el.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com
Subject: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/irq:
  Retrieve irq data after locking irq_desc

Commit-ID:  09cf92b784fae6109450c5d64f9908066d605249
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/09cf92b784fae6109450c5d64f9908066d605249
Author:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 17:12:35 +0000
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 11:54:04 +0200

x86/irq: Retrieve irq data after locking irq_desc

irq_data is protected by irq_desc->lock, so retrieving the irq chip
from irq_data outside the lock is racy vs. an concurrent update. Move
it into the lock held region.

While at it add a comment why the vector walk does not require
vector_lock.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: xiao jin <jin.xiao@...el.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Yanmin Zhang <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150705171102.331320612@linutronix.de
---
 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index 85ca76e..c7dfe1b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -497,6 +497,11 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
 	 */
 	mdelay(1);
 
+	/*
+	 * We can walk the vector array of this cpu without holding
+	 * vector_lock because the cpu is already marked !online, so
+	 * nothing else will touch it.
+	 */
 	for (vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; vector < NR_VECTORS; vector++) {
 		unsigned int irr;
 
@@ -508,9 +513,9 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
 			irq = __this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]);
 
 			desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
+			raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
 			data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
 			chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(data);
-			raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
 			if (chip->irq_retrigger) {
 				chip->irq_retrigger(data);
 				__this_cpu_write(vector_irq[vector], VECTOR_RETRIGGERED);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ