[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150707104150.GC13811@amd>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:41:50 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rx51-battery.ko incompatiblity: board code vs DT
On Mon 2015-07-06 21:44:22, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hello,
>
> now I found out that rx51-battery.ko driver register sysnode
> /sys/class/power_supply/rx51-battery/ when booting with legacy board
> code. But when booting DT kernel it register sysnode with different name
> /sys/class/power_supply/n900-battery/
>
> Sysfs node for DT kernel comes from Nokia N900 DTS file:
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dts
>
> I would propose change which change DTS to "rx51-battery" to have it
> compatible with naming which is for legacy board code. It is just
> because to have compatibility and same naming scheme and also to make
> existing programs to work without needing patching them.
>
> What do you think?
Makes sense.. along with _big_ comment in the dts why we are doing
this.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists