lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 7 Jul 2015 11:43:04 +0000
From:	He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
To:	<rostedt@...dmis.org>, <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>, <acme@...nel.org>,
	<a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
	<namhyung@...nel.org>, <jolsa@...nel.org>
CC:	<wangnan0@...wei.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<hekuang@...wei.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 0/2] Make eBPF programs output data to perf event

Hi,

The two previous versions tried to combine bpf output data with the
sample event of the attached kprobe point, which leads to problems
about perf_trace_buf.

After discussion we found it's not necessary to combine those two
parts of information, even we do not need the orignial kprobe output
event at all. Based on this idea, the implementation becomes simple,
just like what perf do with ftrace:functions, we set up a bpf ftrace
entry for perf tools to poll and collect data on it, eBpf program use
a helper function to submit data to ring-buffer, that's all. This
implementation also leaves all issues such as sample-types to perf
commandline.

Currently, we just use raw data in the format fields to not interfere
perf sample parser, because the raw-data can be parsed by perf script
plugin easily.

Modify the sample in patch v1 slightly:

  SEC("generic_perform_write=generic_perform_write")
  int NODE_generic_perform_write(struct pt_regs *ctx)
  {
          char fmt[] = "generic_perform_write, cur=0x%llx, del=0x%llx\n";
          u64 cur_time, del_time;
          int ind =0;
          struct time_table output, *last = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&global_time_table, &ind);
          if (!last)
                  return 0;

          cur_time = bpf_ktime_get_ns();
          if (!last->last_time)
                  del_time = 0;
          else
                  del_time = cur_time - last->last_time;

          /* For debug */
          bpf_trace_printk(fmt, sizeof(fmt), cur_time, del_time);

          /* Update time table */
          output.last_time = cur_time;
          bpf_map_update_elem(&global_time_table, &ind, &output, BPF_ANY);

          /* This is a casual condition to show the funciton */
          if (del_time < 1000)
                  return 0;

          bpf_output_sample(&del_time, sizeof(del_time));

          return 0;
  }

Record bpf events:

  $ perf record -e ftrace:bpf -e sample.o -- dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=4k count=3

The results showed in perf-script:

  $ perf script
  dd   994 [000]   166.686779: ftrace:bpf: 8: (000000000542b426, ...)
  dd   994 [000]   166.686779: ftrace:bpf: 8: (00000000001011ef, ...)
  dd   994 [000]   166.686779: ftrace:bpf: 8: (000000000007a2b6, ...)

Thank you.

He Kuang (2):
  tracing: Add new trace type for bpf data output
  bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf event

 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h     |  3 +++
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c     | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/trace/trace.h         |  6 ++++++
 kernel/trace/trace_entries.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 samples/bpf/bpf_helpers.h    |  2 ++
 5 files changed, 72 insertions(+)

-- 
1.8.5.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ