lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1436293469-25707-42-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Date:	Tue,  7 Jul 2015 19:24:24 +0100
From:	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
To:	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com
Cc:	vincent.guittot@...aro.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
	Dietmar Eggemann <Dietmar.Eggemann@....com>,
	yuyang.du@...el.com, mturquette@...libre.com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
	Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>, sgurrappadi@...dia.com,
	pang.xunlei@....com.cn, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Subject: [RFCv5 PATCH 41/46] sched/fair: add triggers for OPP change requests

From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>

Each time a task is {en,de}queued we might need to adapt the current
frequency to the new usage. Add triggers on {en,de}queue_task_fair() for
this purpose.  Only trigger a freq request if we are effectively waking up
or going to sleep.  Filter out load balancing related calls to reduce the
number of triggers.

cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>

Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index f74e9d2..b8627c6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4281,7 +4281,10 @@ static inline void hrtick_update(struct rq *rq)
 }
 #endif
 
+static unsigned int capacity_margin = 1280; /* ~20% margin */
+
 static bool cpu_overutilized(int cpu);
+static unsigned long get_cpu_usage(int cpu);
 struct static_key __sched_energy_freq __read_mostly = STATIC_KEY_INIT_FALSE;
 
 /*
@@ -4332,6 +4335,26 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 		if (!task_new && !rq->rd->overutilized &&
 		    cpu_overutilized(rq->cpu))
 			rq->rd->overutilized = true;
+		/*
+		 * We want to trigger a freq switch request only for tasks that
+		 * are waking up; this is because we get here also during
+		 * load balancing, but in these cases it seems wise to trigger
+		 * as single request after load balancing is done.
+		 *
+		 * XXX: how about fork()? Do we need a special flag/something
+		 *      to tell if we are here after a fork() (wakeup_task_new)?
+		 *
+		 * Also, we add a margin (same ~20% used for the tipping point)
+		 * to our request to provide some head room if p's utilization
+		 * further increases.
+		 */
+		if (sched_energy_freq() && !task_new) {
+			unsigned long req_cap = get_cpu_usage(cpu_of(rq));
+
+			req_cap = req_cap * capacity_margin
+					>> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
+			cpufreq_sched_set_cap(cpu_of(rq), req_cap);
+		}
 	}
 	hrtick_update(rq);
 }
@@ -4393,6 +4416,23 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 	if (!se) {
 		sub_nr_running(rq, 1);
 		update_rq_runnable_avg(rq, 1);
+		/*
+		 * We want to trigger a freq switch request only for tasks that
+		 * are going to sleep; this is because we get here also during
+		 * load balancing, but in these cases it seems wise to trigger
+		 * as single request after load balancing is done.
+		 *
+		 * Also, we add a margin (same ~20% used for the tipping point)
+		 * to our request to provide some head room if p's utilization
+		 * further increases.
+		 */
+		if (sched_energy_freq() && task_sleep) {
+			unsigned long req_cap = get_cpu_usage(cpu_of(rq));
+
+			req_cap = req_cap * capacity_margin
+					>> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
+			cpufreq_sched_set_cap(cpu_of(rq), req_cap);
+		}
 	}
 	hrtick_update(rq);
 }
@@ -4959,8 +4999,6 @@ static int find_new_capacity(struct energy_env *eenv,
 	return idx;
 }
 
-static unsigned int capacity_margin = 1280; /* ~20% margin */
-
 static bool cpu_overutilized(int cpu)
 {
 	return (capacity_of(cpu) * 1024) <
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ