lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 07 Jul 2015 15:32:50 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Sreenath Madasu <sreenath.madasu@...il.com>
Cc:	jteki@...nedev.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Warnings : Fixed 80 character length warning in rtw_ap.c

On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 21:53:26 -0400, Sreenath Madasu said:
> When the checkpatch.pl script was run, it showed lines with length
> more than 80 characters in rtw_ap.c file. Fixed line number 382 by
> breaking it up into two lines within 80 characters.


> -				stainfo_offset = rtw_stainfo_offset(pstapriv, psta);
> +				stainfo_offset =
> +					rtw_stainfo_offset(pstapriv, psta);
>  				if (stainfo_offset_valid(stainfo_offset))
>  					chk_alive_list[chk_alive_num++] = stainfo_offset;

Umm... Sreenath?

There's 97 more occurrences of the same problem in that file.

All:  Is it time to kill that checkpatch test, or hide it behind a non-default
flag, to prevent code churn?


Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ