[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLU0XnQfmPLOVqRtv0z_jU6kDFdK6rkfBNh11Ri-q5gPqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 13:09:55 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Bamvor Zhang Jian <bamvor.zhangjian@...aro.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, y2039@...ts.linaro.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] y2038: add 64bit time_t support in timeval for
32bit architecture
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Bamvor Zhang Jian
<bamvor.zhangjian@...aro.org> wrote:
> +int get_timeval64(struct timeval64 *tv,
> + const struct __kernel_timeval __user *utv)
> +{
> + struct __kernel_timeval ktv;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = copy_from_user(&ktv, utv, sizeof(ktv));
> + if (ret)
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + tv->tv_sec = ktv.tv_sec;
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> + || is_compat_task()
> +#endif
These sorts of ifdefs are to be avoided inside of functions.
Instead, it seems is_compat_task() should be defined to 0 in the
!CONFIG_COMPAT case, so you can avoid the ifdefs and the compiler can
still optimize it out.
Otherwise this looks similar to a patch Baolin (cc'ed) has been working on.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists