linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add support for VLAN Table Unit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150708201244.GE1357@lunn.ch>
Date:	Wed, 8 Jul 2015 22:12:44 +0200
From:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel <kernel@...oirfairelinux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add support for VLAN Table
 Unit

> I understand. However this whole VLAN thing represents a lot of code.
> Some other work depends on portions of it. Do you think it'd be OK if I
> resend the patch 1/3 alone? Having only the VTU operations and "vtu"
> debugfs file does not break the actual behavior, and will lighten up the
> following patchsets.

It might be a bit early for that. All the previous versions of 1/3
have had issues with number of ports. I've not had time to take a
close look to see if there are other problems.

If somebody else does a proper review and says its O.K, them i'm
O.K. with that. But until that happens, i don't think it should go in.

     Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/