[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1436392156.12255.99.camel@stgolabs.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 14:49:16 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Cc: mtk.manpages@...il.com, Marcus Gelderie <redmnic@...il.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
John Duffy <jb_duffy@...nternet.com>,
Arto Bendiken <arto@...diken.net>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ipc: Modify message queue accounting to not take
kernel data structures into account
On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 15:17 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> I responded yesterday in the v2 patch thread I believe. In any case, I
> think this patch is fine, and can go to stable. This patch doesn't
> actually change the math related to the rlimit checks (which is the main
> thing I wanted to correct in my original patches), instead it corrects a
> mistake I made. At the time, I mistakenly thought that the qsize
> included the current message data total + the struct msg_msg size total.
> It didn't, it was just the current user data total. I added the rbtree
> nodes in order to keep the total accurate but I shouldn't have added the
> rbtree nodes to this total because none of the other kernel usage was
> previously included.
Exactly, this is what I was referring to when I suggested staying clear
from rlimit modifications. It just makes 0 sense to account for each
rbtree.
Thanks for taking a look!
>
> Acked-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists