linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.1 04/56] can: fix loss of CAN frames in raw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150708073238.008851421@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Wed,  8 Jul 2015 00:34:53 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Manfred Schlaegl <manfred.schlaegl@....at>,
	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.1 04/56] can: fix loss of CAN frames in raw_rcv

4.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>

commit 36c01245eb8046c16eee6431e7dbfbb302635fa8 upstream.

As reported by Manfred Schlaegl here

   http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=143482089824232&w=2

commit 514ac99c64b "can: fix multiple delivery of a single CAN frame for
overlapping CAN filters" requires the skb->tstamp to be set to check for
identical CAN skbs.

As net timestamping is influenced by several players (netstamp_needed and
netdev_tstamp_prequeue) Manfred missed a proper timestamp which leads to
CAN frame loss.

As skb timestamping became now mandatory for CAN related skbs this patch
makes sure that received CAN skbs always have a proper timestamp set.
Maybe there's a better solution in the future but this patch fixes the
CAN frame loss so far.

Reported-by: Manfred Schlaegl <manfred.schlaegl@....at>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/net/can/dev.c   |    5 +++++
 drivers/net/can/slcan.c |    1 +
 drivers/net/can/vcan.c  |    3 +++
 net/can/af_can.c        |    6 +++++-
 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/net/can/dev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/dev.c
@@ -440,6 +440,9 @@ unsigned int can_get_echo_skb(struct net
 		struct can_frame *cf = (struct can_frame *)skb->data;
 		u8 dlc = cf->can_dlc;
 
+		if (!(skb->tstamp.tv64))
+			__net_timestamp(skb);
+
 		netif_rx(priv->echo_skb[idx]);
 		priv->echo_skb[idx] = NULL;
 
@@ -575,6 +578,7 @@ struct sk_buff *alloc_can_skb(struct net
 	if (unlikely(!skb))
 		return NULL;
 
+	__net_timestamp(skb);
 	skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_CAN);
 	skb->pkt_type = PACKET_BROADCAST;
 	skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
@@ -603,6 +607,7 @@ struct sk_buff *alloc_canfd_skb(struct n
 	if (unlikely(!skb))
 		return NULL;
 
+	__net_timestamp(skb);
 	skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_CANFD);
 	skb->pkt_type = PACKET_BROADCAST;
 	skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
--- a/drivers/net/can/slcan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/slcan.c
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ static void slc_bump(struct slcan *sl)
 	if (!skb)
 		return;
 
+	__net_timestamp(skb);
 	skb->dev = sl->dev;
 	skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_CAN);
 	skb->pkt_type = PACKET_BROADCAST;
--- a/drivers/net/can/vcan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/vcan.c
@@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ static void vcan_rx(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	skb->dev       = dev;
 	skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
 
+	if (!(skb->tstamp.tv64))
+		__net_timestamp(skb);
+
 	netif_rx_ni(skb);
 }
 
--- a/net/can/af_can.c
+++ b/net/can/af_can.c
@@ -310,8 +310,12 @@ int can_send(struct sk_buff *skb, int lo
 		return err;
 	}
 
-	if (newskb)
+	if (newskb) {
+		if (!(newskb->tstamp.tv64))
+			__net_timestamp(newskb);
+
 		netif_rx_ni(newskb);
+	}
 
 	/* update statistics */
 	can_stats.tx_frames++;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/