[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <559CDC2E.7060505@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 13:45:42 +0530
From: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<t-kristo@...com>, <nsekhar@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] crypto: omap-aes: Add support for GCM mode
On Wednesday 08 July 2015 01:18 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 12:29:47PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>
>>>> + if (req->assoclen + req->cryptlen == 0) {
>>>> + scatterwalk_map_and_copy(ctx->auth_tag, req->dst, 0, authlen,
>>>> + 1);
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> How can this be right? Did you enable the selftest?
>> Why not? Self tests are passed for this case.
>>
>> As per the equation given in GCM spec[1], we can see that
>> if assoclen and cryptlen is 0, then output of GCM is just E(K, Y0)
>> where Y0 = IV||(0^31)1
>> I have E(K, Y0) calculated in previous step. And copying it
>> to destination if assoclen and cryptlen is 0.
>>
>> Correct me if I am wrong.
>
> It should be E(K, Y0) ^ GHASH(0). So unless GHASH(0) == 0, your
> code doesn't work.
Yes, thats right. I have considered that.
So, we need GHASH(H, {}, {}).
As per the spec,
GHASH(H, A, C) = X(m + n + 1).
m = n = 0 in our case.
X0 = 0
X1 = (X(m + n) ^ (len(A) || len(C)) . H
X1 = 0 . H (GF(128) Multiplication)
X1 = 0
The same thing is given in the Test case 1 of the spec. GHASH(H, {}, {}) = 0
Thanks and regards,
Lokesh
>
> Cheers,
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists