[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150708090427.GY3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:04:27 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@...ernode.on.net>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: lock-up with module: Optimize __module_address() using a latched
RB-tree
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 06:01:29PM +0930, Arthur Marsh wrote:
>
>
> Peter Zijlstra wrote on 08/07/15 07:41:
> >On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 11:56:20PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> >Could you try the below? It appears there was a spot freeing modules
> >that forgot to take them out of the tree.
> >
> >If that fails, try and disable CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD.
>
> I tried the patch below, re-built and installed and booted the kernel and
> saw:
>
> http://www.users.on.net/~arthur.marsh/20150708471.jpg
> http://www.users.on.net/~arthur.marsh/20150708472.jpg
Ah, that's a lockdep splat, caused by Mathieu's patch. Did the system
boot otherwise?
Maybe take that patch from Mathieu out again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists