[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150708103429.GL7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:34:29 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
Cc: will.deacon@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, Catalin.Marinas@....com,
Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm: psci: add cpuidle_ops support
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 06:13:37PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> This patch implements cpuidle_ops using psci. After this patch, we can use
> cpuidle-arm.c with psci backend for both arm and arm64.
I really don't see the point of most of the patches in this series.
To summarise, what you're doing is:
1. Renaming arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c to arch/arm/kernel/psci.c
2. Adding a #ifdef CONFIG_SMP around _all_ the code in psci.c
3. Adding cpuidle code with an #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE around all the
CPU idle code.
So, we end up with a file which contains:
/*
header
*/
#include statements
/*
some commentry relevant to SMP code
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
... cpu idle code ...
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
... smp code ...
#endif
which (a) is a mess, and (b) is unnecessary. The only relevant bits which
are shared are the #include statements.
Please try this alternative approach:
1. Leave psci_smp.c alone.
2. Add arch/arm/kernel/psci_cpuidle.c containing the #include statements
you need, and the CPU idle code.
I think such an approach will reduce your patch series to two patches,
one moving the ARM64 code, and one adding the cpuidle code.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists