[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <559D1C8E.3040704@citrix.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 13:50:22 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
<david.vrabel@...rix.com>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: <elena.ufimtseva@...cle.com>, <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
<ian.campbell@...rix.com>, <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
<andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>, <tim@....org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <jbeulich@...e.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <ian.jackson@...citrix.com>,
<roger.pau@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6] 32-bit PVH domU support
On 07/07/15 04:34, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
> A set of PVH-related patches.
>
> The first patch is x86-64 ABI fix for PVH guests. The second is a small update
> that removes redundant memset (both on PV and PVH code paths)
>
> The rest is to enable non-privileged 32-bit PVH guests. This requires hypervisor
> patches from
> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-06/msg04817.html
The more I look at the PVH entry point into Linux, and the less I like
it -- it's much too PV-like instead of HVM-like.
However, this 32-bit support doesn't make it much worse and until
there's a decision on the longterm future of PVH I'm inclined to accept
it (provided the hypervisor side is accepted) to make it easier to
continue working on PVH support.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists