[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150708125449.GB9181@lerouge>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 14:54:50 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kmod: Add up-to-date explanations on the purpose of
each asynchronous levels
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 04:07:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 17:33:40 +0200 Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > There seem to be quite some confusions on the comments, likely due to
> > changes that came after them.
> >
> > Now since it's very non obvious why we have 3 levels of asynchronous
> > code to implement usermodehelpers, it's important to comment in detail
> > the reason of this layout.
>
> There are still a few references to keventd in there. One of them is
> simply wrong: "runs as a child of keventd". The userspace code is
> actually a child of the khelper thread, yes?
>
> I guess we should remove all kernel references to "keventd". It got
> renamed to "kworker".
Right, I think I missed them because I confused khelper with keventd.
In fact here they are all children of khelper, which is the singlethread
workqueue tied to kmod.
But I'm working on a new iteration that makes use of a global no numa
workqueue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists