[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150708133107.GB26095@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 19:01:07 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
mgorman@...e.de, peterz@...radead.org, efault@....de,
mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Prefer NUMA hotness over cache
hotness
* Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2015-07-07 05:49:31]:
> * tip-bot for Srikar Dronamraju <tipbot@...or.com> [2015-07-06 08:50:28]:
>
> > Commit-ID: 8a9e62a238a3033158e0084d8df42ea116d69ce1
> > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/8a9e62a238a3033158e0084d8df42ea116d69ce1
> > Author: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > AuthorDate: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:25:59 +0530
> > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > CommitDate: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 15:29:55 +0200
> >
> > sched/numa: Prefer NUMA hotness over cache hotness
>
> In the above commit, I missed a fact that sched feature NUMA was used to
> enable/disable NUMA_BALANCING. The below version of the same patch takes
> care of this fact. While I am posting the fixed version, it would need a
> revert of the above commit. Please let me know if you just want the
> differential patch that can apply on top of the above commit.
Posted the differential patch just in case you are looking for it.
http://mid.gmane.org/1436361633-4970-1-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists