[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150708001914.GE31287@byungchulpark-X58A-UD3R>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 09:19:14 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: let __sched_period() use rq cfs's nr_running
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 01:28:18PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 9:40 PM, <byungchul.park@....com> wrote:
> > From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
> >
> > __sched_period() returns a period which a rq can have. the period has to be
> > stretched by the number of task *the rq has*, when nr_running > nr_latency.
> > otherwise, task slice can be very smaller than sysctl_sched_min_granularity
> > depending on the position of tg hierarchy when CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED.
>
>
> Hmm, rq_of(cfs_rq)->cfs should point to the root cfs_rq whose
> ->nr_running is number of running entities at root level? This
> doesn't look right.
hello, cong wang,
__sched_period() returns a root level period now. stretching the period with
a local task group's nr_running is meaningless for getting this period.
is there something i missed? :)
thank you,
byungchul
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists