[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1507081559320.5134@nanos>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 16:00:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/kconfig/32: Mark CONFIG_VM86 as BROKEN
On Tue, 7 Jul 2015, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 7/7/2015 6:25 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > VM86 is entirely broken if ptrace, syscall auditing, or NOHZ_FULL is
> > in use. The code is a big undocumented mess, it's a real PITA to
> > test, and it looks like a big chunk of vm86_32.c is dead code. It
> > also plays awful games with the entry asm.
> >
> > No one should be using it anyway. Use DOSBOX or KVM instead.
> >
> > Mark it BROKEN. I want to remove some (obviously incorrect) exit
> > asm that it depends on, and I don't want to figure out how to run
> > severely obsolete programs just to test something that no one uses
> > for anything other than exploits anyway.
> >
>
> while it is never great to deprecate features, in this case I am not sure
> there is another choice unless someone steps up to seriously revamp this code.
> (and look at it from a PREEMPT, NO_HZ etc etc angle)
Aside of being broken in so many aspects it's even more obsolete than
386 support, we should just remove it right away.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists