[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150708150914.9112.89358@quantum>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 08:09:14 -0700
From: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
To: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@...aro.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
"Dietmar Eggemann" <Dietmar.Eggemann@....com>, yuyang.du@...el.com,
rjw@...ysocki.net, "Juri Lelli" <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
sgurrappadi@...dia.com, pang.xunlei@....com.cn,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 37/46] cpufreq: introduce cpufreq_driver_might_sleep
Quoting Morten Rasmussen (2015-07-07 11:24:20)
> From: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
>
> Some architectures and platforms perform CPU frequency transitions
> through a non-blocking method, while some might block or sleep. This
> distinction is important when trying to change frequency from interrupt
> context or in any other non-interruptable context, such as from the
> Linux scheduler.
>
> Describe this distinction with a cpufreq driver flag,
> CPUFREQ_DRIVER_WILL_NOT_SLEEP. The default is to not have this flag set,
> thus erring on the side of caution.
>
> cpufreq_driver_might_sleep() is also introduced in this patch. Setting
> the above flag will allow this function to return false.
>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Hi Morten,
I believe your sign-off is needed here as well.
Regards,
Mike
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 ++++++
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 9 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 8ae655c..5753cb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -112,6 +112,12 @@ bool have_governor_per_policy(void)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(have_governor_per_policy);
>
> +bool cpufreq_driver_might_sleep(void)
> +{
> + return !(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_DRIVER_WILL_NOT_SLEEP);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_driver_might_sleep);
> +
> struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> if (have_governor_per_policy())
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 2ee4888..1f2c9a1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ u64 get_cpu_idle_time(unsigned int cpu, u64 *wall, int io_busy);
> int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu);
> int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu);
> bool have_governor_per_policy(void);
> +bool cpufreq_driver_might_sleep(void);
> struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
> #else
> static inline unsigned int cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
> @@ -314,6 +315,14 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
> */
> #define CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK (1 << 5)
>
> +/*
> + * Set by drivers that will never block or sleep during their frequency
> + * transition. Used to indicate when it is safe to call cpufreq_driver_target
> + * from non-interruptable context. Drivers must opt-in to this flag, as the
> + * safe default is that they might sleep.
> + */
> +#define CPUFREQ_DRIVER_WILL_NOT_SLEEP (1 << 6)
> +
> int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
> int cpufreq_unregister_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists