[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <559D4437.5040604@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 11:39:35 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry/64: Clean up entry_64.S
On 07/06/2015 02:39 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> I can reproduce the difference now. Give me a few minutes to see if I
>> > can figure out what's causing it.
> It's debug info. If I strip the two .o files, the results are
> identical. I think the differences are just line numbers.
>
> Why would this matter? Sasha, can you double-check that this patch
> really introduced the problem?
I wasn't sure that that patch is causing the problem to begin with, I just
singled it out because I saw it generated changes and git blame pointed
to it wrt to modified lines.
I wasn't able to reproduce that issue again, I'll update when/if I do.
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists