[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150708164034.9112.35895@quantum>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 09:40:34 -0700
From: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
To: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com
Cc: vincent.guittot@...aro.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
"Dietmar Eggemann" <Dietmar.Eggemann@....com>, yuyang.du@...el.com,
rjw@...ysocki.net, "Juri Lelli" <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
sgurrappadi@...dia.com, pang.xunlei@....com.cn,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv5 PATCH 44/46] sched/fair: jump to max OPP when crossing UP
threshold
Quoting Morten Rasmussen (2015-07-07 11:24:27)
> From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
>
> Since the true utilization of a long running task is not detectable while
> it is running and might be bigger than the current cpu capacity, create the
> maximum cpu capacity head room by requesting the maximum cpu capacity once
> the cpu usage plus the capacity margin exceeds the current capacity. This
> is also done to try to harm the performance of a task the least.
>
> cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 323331f..c2d6de4 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -8586,6 +8586,25 @@ static void task_tick_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr, int queued)
>
> if (!rq->rd->overutilized && cpu_overutilized(task_cpu(curr)))
> rq->rd->overutilized = true;
> +
> + /*
> + * To make free room for a task that is building up its "real"
> + * utilization and to harm its performance the least, request a
> + * jump to max OPP as soon as get_cpu_usage() crosses the UP
> + * threshold. The UP threshold is built relative to the current
> + * capacity (OPP), by using same margin used to tell if a cpu
> + * is overutilized (capacity_margin).
> + */
> + if (sched_energy_freq()) {
> + int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
> + unsigned long capacity_orig = capacity_orig_of(cpu);
> + unsigned long capacity_curr = capacity_curr_of(cpu);
> +
> + if (capacity_curr < capacity_orig &&
> + (capacity_curr * SCHED_LOAD_SCALE) <
> + (get_cpu_usage(cpu) * capacity_margin))
As I stated in a previous patch, I wonder if the multiplications can be
removed by assuming equivalent units for load and capacity and simply
adding the 256 (25%) margin to the valued returned by get_cpu_usage?
Regards,
Mike
> + cpufreq_sched_set_cap(cpu, capacity_orig);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists