linux-kernel - Re: printk: preempt_disable with long time resulting in softlockup/RCU stall issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150708170402.GZ7021@wotan.suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 8 Jul 2015 19:04:02 +0200
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
To:	Gavin Hu <gavin.hu.2010@...il.com>
Cc:	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
	"Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, cxie4@...vell.com, cldu@...vell.com,
	xjian@...vell.com, fswu@...vell.com, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: printk: preempt_disable with long time resulting in
 softlockup/RCU stall issues

On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 05:08:35PM +0800, Gavin Hu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Yes. We should disable the printk_limit feature when panic to avoid missing
> messages.

Sounds like you have been looking into it and have a good idea of what you
want to do, why not try it and send some RFC patches ?

While at it, then we could consider doing different things depending on the
message type. KERN_EMERG would disable preemption, whereas KERN_INFO may not be
so critical to require it.

 Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/