[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150708173458.GB10589@red-moon>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:34:58 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
Cc: "linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm: kernel: implement cpuidle_ops with psci
backend
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 01:51:08PM +0100, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> This patch implements cpuidle_ops using psci. After this patch, we can
> use cpuidle-arm.c with psci backend for both arm and arm64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm/kernel/psci_cpuidle.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/psci_cpuidle.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
> index 3b995f5..96383d8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_VIRT_EXT) += hyp-stub.o
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARM_PSCI),y)
> obj-y += psci-call.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += psci_smp.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_IDLE) += psci_cpuidle.o
> endif
>
> extra-y := $(head-y) vmlinux.lds
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/psci_cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/kernel/psci_cpuidle.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ae85d97
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/psci_cpuidle.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2015 Marvell Technology Group Ltd.
> + * Author: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
> +#include <linux/psci.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/cpuidle.h>
> +
> +static int psci_cpuidle_suspend(int cpu, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + return cpu_psci_cpu_suspend(arg);
> +}
> +
> +static int psci_cpuidle_init(struct device_node *node, int cpu)
> +{
> + return cpu_psci_cpu_init_idle(cpu);
> +}
It probably makes sense to change the prototypes now that there is
just one cpuidle ops merged for arm, better now than later.
I am not too fussed about leaving these shims, but I think this can
save us some time in the future.
Daniel what do you think ?
Lorenzo
> +
> +static struct cpuidle_ops psci_cpuidle_ops __initdata = {
> + .suspend = psci_cpuidle_suspend,
> + .init = psci_cpuidle_init,
> +};
> +CPUIDLE_METHOD_OF_DECLARE(psci_cpuidle, "psci", &psci_cpuidle_ops);
> --
> 2.1.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists