[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hKe1c0gwnvRjr+KTgXg23W+SRHk3ZEYCtzh4cL2pqkZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:43:23 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>, Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] driver-core: add asynchronous probing support for drivers
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 07:09:19AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> The problem I ran into was needing to remove devices that still had
>> yet to be probed and not being able to use registration completion vs
>> the device_lock() to effectively synchronize the sub-system.
>
> Why do you need to "synchronize the sub-system"? The asynchronous
> probing should be transparent to the driver. Just unregister the device
> (or the driver) and driver core will ensure that probe() is not in
> flight.
Async registration is indeed transparent to the driver. The primary
need to "flush registration" is the case of "region" devices that
reference a set of NVDIMM devices. A region device requires all
related NVDIMMs to be active before the region can be enabled.
I'll look into a more concrete example of the tradeoffs between
asynchronous probing vs registration.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists