| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20150709164304.26b6c2be@xhacker>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 16:43:04 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
To: <linux@....linux.org.uk>, <will.deacon@....com>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
<Catalin.Marinas@....com>, <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
<galak@...eaurora.org>, <agross@...eaurora.org>,
<davidb@...eaurora.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ARM: cpuidle: refine cpuidle_ops member's
parameters.
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 16:31:24 +0800
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com> wrote:
> As for the suspend member function, the to-be-suspended cpu is always
> the calling cpu itself, so the 'cpu' parameter may not be necessary, let
> driver get 'cpu' itself if need.
>
> As for the init member function, the device_node here may not be
> necessary either, because we can get the node via. of_get_cpu_node().
This patch also changes drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c accordingly, but I have no
qcom platform, so I can't test it, just make sure it can pass kernel building.
Could anyone kindly help me to test?
Thanks a lot,
Jisheng
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h | 6 +++---
> arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> index 0f84249..ca5dfe6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> @@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ static inline int arm_cpuidle_simple_enter(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> struct device_node;
>
> struct cpuidle_ops {
> - int (*suspend)(int cpu, unsigned long arg);
> - int (*init)(struct device_node *, int cpu);
> + int (*suspend)(unsigned long arg);
> + int (*init)(unsigned int cpu);
> };
>
> struct of_cpuidle_method {
> @@ -46,6 +46,6 @@ struct of_cpuidle_method {
>
> extern int arm_cpuidle_suspend(int index);
>
> -extern int arm_cpuidle_init(int cpu);
> +extern int arm_cpuidle_init(unsigned int cpu);
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> index 318da33..7bc7bc6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
> @@ -53,10 +53,10 @@ int arm_cpuidle_simple_enter(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> int arm_cpuidle_suspend(int index)
> {
> int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> - int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
> if (cpuidle_ops[cpu].suspend)
> - ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].suspend(cpu, index);
> + ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].suspend(index);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static int __init arm_cpuidle_read_ops(struct device_node *dn, int cpu)
> * -ENXIO if the HW reports a failure or a misconfiguration,
> * -ENOMEM if the HW report an memory allocation failure
> */
> -int __init arm_cpuidle_init(int cpu)
> +int __init arm_cpuidle_init(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> struct device_node *cpu_node = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
> int ret;
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ int __init arm_cpuidle_init(int cpu)
>
> ret = arm_cpuidle_read_ops(cpu_node, cpu);
> if (!ret && cpuidle_ops[cpu].init)
> - ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].init(cpu_node, cpu);
> + ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].init(cpu);
>
> of_node_put(cpu_node);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
> index b04b05a..1649ec3 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static const struct spm_reg_data spm_reg_8064_cpu = {
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct spm_driver_data *, cpu_spm_drv);
>
> -typedef int (*idle_fn)(int);
> +typedef int (*idle_fn)(void);
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(idle_fn*, qcom_idle_ops);
>
> static inline void spm_register_write(struct spm_driver_data *drv,
> @@ -179,9 +179,10 @@ static int qcom_pm_collapse(unsigned long int unused)
> return -1;
> }
>
> -static int qcom_cpu_spc(int cpu)
> +static int qcom_cpu_spc(void)
> {
> int ret;
> + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> struct spm_driver_data *drv = per_cpu(cpu_spm_drv, cpu);
>
> spm_set_low_power_mode(drv, PM_SLEEP_MODE_SPC);
> @@ -197,9 +198,11 @@ static int qcom_cpu_spc(int cpu)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int qcom_idle_enter(int cpu, unsigned long index)
> +static int qcom_idle_enter(unsigned long index)
> {
> - return per_cpu(qcom_idle_ops, cpu)[index](cpu);
> + unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +
> + return per_cpu(qcom_idle_ops, cpu)[index]();
> }
>
> static const struct of_device_id qcom_idle_state_match[] __initconst = {
> @@ -207,7 +210,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_idle_state_match[] __initconst = {
> { },
> };
>
> -static int __init qcom_cpuidle_init(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
> +static int __init qcom_cpuidle_init(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> const struct of_device_id *match_id;
> struct device_node *state_node;
> @@ -217,6 +220,10 @@ static int __init qcom_cpuidle_init(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
> idle_fn *fns;
> cpumask_t mask;
> bool use_scm_power_down = false;
> + struct device_node *cpu_node = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
> +
> + if (!cpu_node)
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> for (i = 0; ; i++) {
> state_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "cpu-idle-states", i);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists