[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <559E476E.2000306@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 11:05:34 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
CC: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
"kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] arm/arm64: Add new is_kernel_in_hyp_mode predicate
On 09/07/15 10:42, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> +static inline bool is_kernel_in_hyp_mode(void)
>> +{
>> + u64 el;
>> +
>> + asm("mrs %0, CurrentEL" : "=r" (el));
>> + return el == CurrentEL_EL2;
>> +}
>
> If you can include cputype.h, I think this can be:
>
> static inline bool is_kernel_in_hyp_mode(void)
> {
> return read_cpuid(CurrentEL) == CurrentEL_EL2;
> }
This would indeed work, but CurrentEL is hardly an ID register. I feel
slightly uncomfortable using read_cpuid (which might return a cached
version at some point) for random system registers.
Thoughts?
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists