[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150709182525.GA27758@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:25:25 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
valentin.manea@...wei.com, jean-michel.delorme@...com,
emmanuel.michel@...com, javier@...igon.com,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] tee: generic TEE subsystem
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 02:49:08PM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> > Generally in a scheme like this we'd see open and release get/put the
> > underlying module handle to prevent driver removal while the char dev
> > is open. Otherwise module removal will hang here.
>
> I'm perhaps misunderstanding you. While the cdev has any open file
> descriptors rmmod will fail with "Resource temporarily unavailable"
> because of fops_get() in chrdev_open().
Hmm, I see, you've done this:
+ cdev_init(&teedev->cdev, &tee_fops);
+ teedev->cdev.owner = teedesc->owner;
And owner here is the driver module? Interesting.. Looks OK..
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists