linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: dra7x-evm: Prevent glitch on DCAN1 pinmux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <559EBEC8.1070609@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jul 2015 20:34:48 +0200
From:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, wg@...ndegger.com, tony@...mide.com
Cc:	jay.schroeder@...min.com, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: dra7x-evm: Prevent glitch on DCAN1 pinmux

On 07/07/2015 04:27 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Driver core sets "default" pinmux on on probe and CAN driver
> sets "sleep" pinmux during register. This causes a small window
> where the CAN pins are in "default" state with the DCAN module
> being disabled.
> 
> Change the "default" state to be like sleep so this glitch is
> avoided. Add a new "active" state that is used by the driver
> when CAN is actually active.

Who is taking care of this patch? I'm applying 1/2 (v2) to linux-can,
should I take this patch, too?

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (456 bytes)