[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <559EC297.3030901@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 11:51:03 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/kconfig/32: Make CONFIG_VM86 default to n and remove
EXPERT
On 7/9/2015 11:40 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> VM86 is entirely broken if ptrace, syscall auditing, or NOHZ_FULL is
> in use. The code is a big undocumented mess, it's a real PITA to
> test, and it looks like a big chunk of vm86_32.c is dead code. It
> also plays awful games with the entry asm.
>
> No one should be using it anyway. Use DOSBOX or KVM instead.
>
> Let's accelerate its slow death. Remove it from EXPERT and default
> it to n. Distros should not enable it. In the unlikely event that
> some user needs it, they can easily re-enable it.
>
> I've confirmed that 'make oldconfig' will set leave it set to y, so
> there should be little or no unexpected breakage from this change.
>
I would rather do BOTH the default n AND the EXPERT
e.g. the existing hurdle of EXPERT combined with the default
(e.g. off entirely in non-EXPERT, and with EXPERT it is sill defaulting to =n)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists