[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrWrJ1CJ6cqpHzOGHSx3BRZ2nYG8dDZWabbaj1n-=YBvng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 15:41:54 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 5/7] x86/vm86: Teach handle_vm86_trap to return to
32bit mode directly
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> The TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME hack it was using was buggy and unsupportable.
> vm86 mode was completely broken under ptrace, for example, because
> we'd never make it to v8086 mode.
>
> This code is still a huge, scary mess, but at least it's no longer
> tangled with the exit-to-userspace loop.
This patch is incorrect. Brian, what's the ETA for your vm86 cleanup?
If it's very soon, then I'll see if I can rely on it. If not, I'll
have to come up with a way to fix this patch.
Grr. The kernel state when handle_vm86_trap is called is absurd right
now. Somehow we're supposed to survive do_trap, send a signal
corresponding to the outside-vm86 state, and exit vm86 cleanly (with
ax = 0), all before returning to user mode. I doubt these semantics
are even intentional.
This code sucks.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists