| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <559FC85D.1010307@oracle.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 09:27:57 -0400 From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@...sung.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry/64: Clean up entry_64.S On 07/08/2015 08:59 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Having failed to bisect, let's look at the trace: > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote: >> [3157054.661763] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> [3157054.662552] kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:533! >> [3157054.663277] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN >> [3157054.664164] Dumping ftrace buffer: >> [3157054.664740] (ftrace buffer empty) >> [3157054.665274] Modules linked in: >> [3157054.665768] CPU: 16 PID: 11446 Comm: trinity-main Not tainted 4.1.0-next-20150703-sasha-00040-gd868f14-dirty #2292 >> [3157054.667203] task: ffff880408813000 ti: ffff8803d29c8000 task.ti: ffff8803d29c8000 >> [3157054.668256] RIP: do_nmi (arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:533 (discriminator 1)) >> [3157054.669378] RSP: 0018:ffff88077800bed8 EFLAGS: 00010006 >> [3157054.670141] ================================================================== >> [3157054.671268] BUG: KASan: out of bounds on stack in __show_regs+0x7f6/0x940 at addr ffff88077800be50 > > I bet that__show_regs interacts poorly with KASan for some reason. > But that's not the underlying bug. In fact, the bad read is quite > close the RSP, so this is almost certainly a bug in KASan or > __show_regs. > >> [3157054.674604] Read of size 8 by task trinity-main/11446 >> [3157054.676521] page:ffffea001de002c0 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping: (null) index:0x0 >> [3157054.679451] flags: 0x42fffff80000400(reserved) >> [3157054.681237] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected >> [3157054.683326] CPU: 16 PID: 11446 Comm: trinity-main Not tainted 4.1.0-next-20150703-sasha-00040-gd868f14-dirty #2292 >> [3157054.687097] ffff88077800be50 000000009c65e33f ffff88077800b9f8 ffffffffa0ac8938 >> [3157054.690303] 1ffffd4003bc0058 ffff88077800ba88 ffff88077800ba78 ffffffff9759796e >> [3157054.693365] ffff88077800bab8 ffffffffa0abe0b3 0000000000000082 ffffffffa2fe39e4 >> [3157054.696209] Call Trace: >> [3157054.697180] <NMI> dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:52) >> [3157054.699390] kasan_report_error (mm/kasan/report.c:132 mm/kasan/report.c:193) >> [3157054.701663] ? printk (kernel/printk/printk.c:1896) >> [3157054.703531] ? bitmap_weight (include/linux/bitmap.h:303) >> [3157054.705553] __asan_report_load8_noabort (mm/kasan/report.c:230 mm/kasan/report.c:251) >> [3157054.708014] ? __show_regs (arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c:68) >> [3157054.710046] __show_regs (arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c:68) >> [3157054.712066] ? printk (kernel/printk/printk.c:1896) >> [3157054.713878] ? bitmap_weight (include/linux/bitmap.h:303) >> [3157054.715875] ? start_thread_common.constprop.0 (arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c:58) >> [3157054.718336] ? dump_stack_print_info (kernel/printk/printk.c:3121) >> [3157054.720619] show_regs (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c:313) >> [3157054.722530] __die (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:294) >> [3157054.724290] die (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:316) >> [3157054.725962] do_trap (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:214 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:260) >> [3157054.727805] do_error_trap (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:298 include/linux/jump_label.h:125 include/linux/context_tracking_state.h:29 include/linux/context_tracking.h:46 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:302) >> [3157054.729843] ? do_device_not_available (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:291) >> [3157054.732211] ? do_nmi (arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:533 (discriminator 1)) >> [3157054.734101] ? kvm_clock_read (./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:87 arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c:86) >> [3157054.736165] ? sched_clock (arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c:305) >> [3157054.738126] ? nmi_handle (arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:134) >> [3157054.740133] ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk (arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.S:40) >> [3157054.742997] do_invalid_op (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:313) >> [3157054.744991] invalid_op (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:925) > > So we got #UD somewhere... > >> [3157054.746873] ? do_nmi (arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:533 (discriminator 1)) >> [3157054.748769] ? do_nmi (arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:515 arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:531) >> [3157054.750658] end_repeat_nmi (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:1435) > > ...here, perhaps? > > Do you know what line 1435 was in the version you tested? There > shouldn't be funny instructions in end_repeat_nmi, though. Did we end > up off an instruction boundary? Yes, arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:1435 is 'call do_nmi', do_nmi does nmi_enter(), which is actually: ? do_nmi (arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c:533 And that has a BUG_ON(in_nmi()); in it. > > Here's my wild guess. The repeat_nmi thing is really rare. What if > there's a CPU or emulator that can't do mov %cr2, %r12 or vice versa? > mov from cr has a somewhat unusual encoding. What platform is this? > Does KASan play games that would cause KVM to emulate a mov to or from > cr2? It's just a regular KVM guest, I'm not sure about KASan (Andrey Cc'ed). Thanks, Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists