linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] kmod: Use system_unbound

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1507100920200.5980@east.gentwo.org>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 09:20:46 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] kmod: Use system_unbound_wq instead of khelper

On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> Now perhaps it is a good thing in the end. At least in nohz full it
> doesn't change anything as we affine that workqueue too. But we must
> be sure that a single NUMA node is enough to handle typical loads of
> usermodehelper.

This is configurable right? So if you screw up you are responsible.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/