lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150710173710.GF2049@linaro.org>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 11:37:10 -0600
From:	Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@...aro.org>
To:	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
Cc:	linux@....linux.org.uk, will.deacon@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, Catalin.Marinas@....com,
	Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com, galak@...eaurora.org,
	agross@...eaurora.org, davidb@...eaurora.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ARM: cpuidle: refine cpuidle_ops member's
 parameters.

On Thu, Jul 09 2015 at 02:33 -0600, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>As for the suspend member function, the to-be-suspended cpu is always
>the calling cpu itself, so the 'cpu' parameter may not be necessary, let
>driver get 'cpu' itself if need.
>
>As for the init member function, the device_node here may not be
>necessary either, because we can get the node via. of_get_cpu_node().
>
>Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>

Tested-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@...aro.org>

>---
> arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h |  6 +++---
> arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c      |  8 ++++----
> drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c         | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h
>index 0f84249..ca5dfe6 100644
>--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h
>+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h
>@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ static inline int arm_cpuidle_simple_enter(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> struct device_node;
>
> struct cpuidle_ops {
>-	int (*suspend)(int cpu, unsigned long arg);
>-	int (*init)(struct device_node *, int cpu);
>+	int (*suspend)(unsigned long arg);
>+	int (*init)(unsigned int cpu);
> };
>
> struct of_cpuidle_method {
>@@ -46,6 +46,6 @@ struct of_cpuidle_method {
>
> extern int arm_cpuidle_suspend(int index);
>
>-extern int arm_cpuidle_init(int cpu);
>+extern int arm_cpuidle_init(unsigned int cpu);
>
> #endif
>diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
>index 318da33..7bc7bc6 100644
>--- a/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
>+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c
>@@ -53,10 +53,10 @@ int arm_cpuidle_simple_enter(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> int arm_cpuidle_suspend(int index)
> {
> 	int ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>-	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>+	unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>
> 	if (cpuidle_ops[cpu].suspend)
>-		ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].suspend(cpu, index);
>+		ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].suspend(index);
>
> 	return ret;
> }
>@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static int __init arm_cpuidle_read_ops(struct device_node *dn, int cpu)
>  *  -ENXIO if the HW reports a failure or a misconfiguration,
>  *  -ENOMEM if the HW report an memory allocation failure
>  */
>-int __init arm_cpuidle_init(int cpu)
>+int __init arm_cpuidle_init(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> 	struct device_node *cpu_node = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
> 	int ret;
>@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ int __init arm_cpuidle_init(int cpu)
>
> 	ret = arm_cpuidle_read_ops(cpu_node, cpu);
> 	if (!ret && cpuidle_ops[cpu].init)
>-		ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].init(cpu_node, cpu);
>+		ret = cpuidle_ops[cpu].init(cpu);
>
> 	of_node_put(cpu_node);
>
>diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
>index b04b05a..1649ec3 100644
>--- a/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
>+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
>@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static const struct spm_reg_data spm_reg_8064_cpu = {
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct spm_driver_data *, cpu_spm_drv);
>
>-typedef int (*idle_fn)(int);
>+typedef int (*idle_fn)(void);
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(idle_fn*, qcom_idle_ops);
>
> static inline void spm_register_write(struct spm_driver_data *drv,
>@@ -179,9 +179,10 @@ static int qcom_pm_collapse(unsigned long int unused)
> 	return -1;
> }
>
>-static int qcom_cpu_spc(int cpu)
>+static int qcom_cpu_spc(void)
> {
> 	int ret;
>+	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> 	struct spm_driver_data *drv = per_cpu(cpu_spm_drv, cpu);
>
> 	spm_set_low_power_mode(drv, PM_SLEEP_MODE_SPC);
>@@ -197,9 +198,11 @@ static int qcom_cpu_spc(int cpu)
> 	return ret;
> }
>
>-static int qcom_idle_enter(int cpu, unsigned long index)
>+static int qcom_idle_enter(unsigned long index)
> {
>-	return per_cpu(qcom_idle_ops, cpu)[index](cpu);
>+	unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>+
>+	return per_cpu(qcom_idle_ops, cpu)[index]();
> }
>
> static const struct of_device_id qcom_idle_state_match[] __initconst = {
>@@ -207,7 +210,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_idle_state_match[] __initconst = {
> 	{ },
> };
>
>-static int __init qcom_cpuidle_init(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
>+static int __init qcom_cpuidle_init(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> 	const struct of_device_id *match_id;
> 	struct device_node *state_node;
>@@ -217,6 +220,10 @@ static int __init qcom_cpuidle_init(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
> 	idle_fn *fns;
> 	cpumask_t mask;
> 	bool use_scm_power_down = false;
>+	struct device_node *cpu_node = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
>+
>+	if (!cpu_node)
>+		return -ENODEV;
>
> 	for (i = 0; ; i++) {
> 		state_node = of_parse_phandle(cpu_node, "cpu-idle-states", i);
>-- 
>2.1.4
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ