lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150710180128.GA8723@Sanchayan-Arch>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 23:31:28 +0530
From:	maitysanchayan@...il.com
To:	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc:	jic23@...nel.org, shawn.guo@...aro.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
	robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	B38611@...escale.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stefan@...er.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Implement sample time consideration for Vybrid's
 ADC

Hello Shawn,

On 15-07-10 16:47:04, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 02:03:39PM +0530, Sanchayan Maity wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > This patchset adds a dt binding for specifying sample time
> > for the vybrid adc driver and takes this into account for
> > sampling frequency calculation and related configuration in
> > the driver.
> > 
> > The patchset is based on top of Stefan's patches here
> > http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1505.3/02043.html
> > 
> > which got recently applied. Tested with shawn's for-next
> > branch.
> > 
> > Changes since v1:
> > 
> > Change from a vendor specific fsl,min-sample-time to non vendor
> > specific min-sample-time.
> 
> What's the reason for that?  Property without vendor prefix would be
> the generic one, which should be defined by generic ADC bindings, not
> vf610-adc.txt.

The reason for going with a generic one was discussed in the first series,
as though there might not be any devices at the moment using this property,
some might appear or use it in the future.

I did consider putting this in the generic ADC bindings, however for lack
of one like one present for touchscreen, I kept it in the vf610 specific
driver binding. Thought there should not be any harm with this.

- Sanchayan.

> 
> Shawn
> 
> > 
> > Version 1 of the patchset can be found here
> > http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1506.1/00026.html
> > 
> > - Sanchayan.
> > 
> > Sanchayan Maity (2):
> >   iio: adc: Determine sampling frequencies by using minimum sample time
> >   ARM: dts: vfxxx: Add property for minimum sample time
> > 
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/vf610-adc.txt      |  6 ++
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/vfxxx.dtsi                       |  2 +
> >  drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c                        | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.4.4
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ