[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55A0348F.606@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 23:09:35 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: eric.auger@...com, eric.auger@...aro.org, joro@...tes.org,
avi.kivity@...il.com, feng.wu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virt: IRQ bypass manager
On 10/07/2015 19:52, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Perhaps if a second consumer comes along that would be justification for
> tying it elsewhere in the build system. ARM will obviously need to do
> similar. Are there better options?
>
> Also, there's no maintainer for the top level virt/ directory. Paolo,
> would you feel comfortable taking this, maybe with some additional acks?
That's okay; alternatively, we can share it since after all you wrote
most of it.
Paolo
> That would probably be the most convenient for merging the consumer code.
> Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists