linux-kernel - Applied "regulator: 88pm800: fix LDO vsel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1ZDM8Z-0000QZ-DF@debutante>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 01:25:55 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Yi Zhang <yizhang@...vell.com>,
	Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: 88pm800: fix LDO vsel_mask value" to the regulator tree

The patch

   regulator: 88pm800: fix LDO vsel_mask value

has been applied to the regulator tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 322dfa6402ec08da1ca182ac0061a1cf2c5c3101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yi Zhang <yizhang@...vell.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 18:11:31 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: 88pm800: fix LDO vsel_mask value

As per datasheet,
Except LDO2, all other LDO's use bit [3:0] for VOUT select.

Current code uses wrong mask value of 0x1f, So this patch
fixes it to use 0xf.

Signed-off-by: Yi Zhang <yizhang@...vell.com>
[vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org: Updated changelog with more detailed description]
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/88pm800.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/88pm800.c b/drivers/regulator/88pm800.c
index 832932bdc977..7fd4f511d78f 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/88pm800.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/88pm800.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ struct pm800_regulators {
 		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,					\
 		.n_voltages = ARRAY_SIZE(ldo_volt_table),		\
 		.vsel_reg	= PM800_##vreg##_VOUT,			\
-		.vsel_mask	= 0x1f,					\
+		.vsel_mask	= 0xf,					\
 		.enable_reg	= PM800_##ereg,				\
 		.enable_mask	= 1 << (ebit),				\
 		.volt_table	= ldo_volt_table,			\
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/