lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 16:47:17 -0700 From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Add rcu_sync infrastructure to avoid _expedited() in percpu-rwsem On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote: > > Linus, I am mostly trying to convince you. Nobody else objected so far. > Could you please comment? I don't mind this part of the series. It's the whole "do we really want to put the effort into percpu-rwsem I worry about, as there just aren't that many users. The conversions made that "too damn special" thing go away, but the conversions (particularly the big _real_ user, namely fs/locks.c) seem to have serious performance problems that are quite possibly not fixable. So my objection isn't to your change, my objection is to the whole "right now there are two users, and they both use a global lock, so *of course* they scale like shit, and this is all just papering over that much more fundamental problem". I hate one-off locking. One-off locking with one global lock? Yeah, that just smells. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists