[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1436584311.3429.7.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 05:11:51 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, riel@...hat.com,
mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
morten.rasmussen@....com, kernel-team <Kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: beef up wake_wide()
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 16:59 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Not quite as awesome but still better than the baseline so we're good.
> Thanks,
I personally like the other much better. We're not doing the user any
favor by making the thing balance when SD_BALANCE_WAKE is set. Until
such time as it ceases to be horribly painful, we're just paying a few
cycles to help a theoretically existing masochist torture his box.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists