linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm/shrinker: make unregister

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 11 Jul 2015 03:02:32 -0700
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm/shrinker: make unregister_shrinker() less fragile

On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 11:51:53AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Shrinker API does not handle nicely unregister_shrinker() on a not-registered
> ->shrinker. Looking at shrinker users, they all have to
> (a) carry on some sort of a flag to make sure that "unregister_shrinker()"
> will not blow up later
> (b) be fishy (potentially can Oops)
> (c) access private members `struct shrinker' (e.g. `shrink.list.next')

Ayone who does that is broken.  You just need to have clear init (with
proper unwinding) and exit functions and order things properly.  It
works like most register/unregister calls and should stay that way.

Maye you you should ty to explain what practical problem you're seeing
to start with.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/