[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a8v1la4k.fsf@belgarion.home>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 16:32:27 +0200
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] media: pxa_camera: trivial move of dma irq functions
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de> writes:
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/pxa_camera.c b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/pxa_camera.c
>> index c0c0f0f..1ab4f9d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/pxa_camera.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/pxa_camera.c
>> @@ -311,6 +311,28 @@ static int calculate_dma_sglen(struct scatterlist *sglist, int sglen,
>>
>> BUG_ON(size != 0);
>> return i + 1;
>> +static void pxa_camera_dma_irq(struct pxa_camera_dev *pcdev,
>> + enum pxa_camera_active_dma act_dma);
>
> Yes, functions look ok now as the sense - they are just moved up with no
> modifications, but the patch itself looks as broken to me as it originally
> was... Please, look 2 lines up - where you add your lines.
Indeed.
I don't know how that could happen. I would have sworn they were in the correct
place, then I rebased / solved conflicts, and ... messed up.
That would be for the v3, and I'll inspect the mails before sending.
Cheers.
--
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists