[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150712041354.GA4002764@mail.thefacebook.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 21:13:54 -0700
From: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: Nagalakshmi Nandigama <nagalakshmi.nandigama@...gotech.com>,
Praveen Krishnamoorthy <praveen.krishnamoorthy@...gotech.com>,
Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@...gotech.com>,
Abhijit Mahajan <abhijit.mahajan@...gotech.com>,
<MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...gotech.com>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] Refactor code to use new fw_event refcount
Thanks for this, I'm sending a v2 shortly.
On Friday 07/03 at 09:00 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 08:50:55PM -0700, Calvin Owens wrote:
> > This refactors the fw_event code to use the new refcount.
>
> I spent some time looking over this code because it's so convoluted.
> In general I think code should either embeed one work_struct (and it
> really doesn't seem to need a delayed work here!) or if needed a list
> and not both like this one. But it's probably too much work to sort
> all this out, so let's go with your version.
Yeah, I tried to get rid of fw_event_list altogether, since I think what
cleanup_queue() does could be simplified to calling flush_workqueue().
The problem is _scsih_check_topo_delete_events(), which looks at the
list and sometimes marks fw_events as "ignored" so they aren't executed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists